tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3166297507174717122.post7993262207970915372..comments2024-03-27T21:42:56.131-05:00Comments on 1001plus: Ten Days of Terror!: QuarantineSJHoneywellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13550007053995112090noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3166297507174717122.post-89241497696250023062018-10-28T19:17:52.883-05:002018-10-28T19:17:52.883-05:00I haven't seen the trailer for this, so I can&...I haven't seen the trailer for this, so I can't really speak to it.<br /><br />Do track down <i>[●REC]</i> when you can. It's brutally short and couldn't really stand to be any longer--it's just about perfect for what it wants to do. You won't get the shocks you would seeing it cold, but it's still very much worth your time. <br /><br />I wouldn't even mind that much if it tried to do something different, but it doesn't. It's not bad--it's just not at all new or different from what already existed.SJHoneywellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13550007053995112090noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3166297507174717122.post-90698197283862055042018-10-28T15:07:56.526-05:002018-10-28T15:07:56.526-05:00I agree that it's usually a pointless and frui...I agree that it's usually a pointless and fruitless endeavor to remake a film within a year or so of the original, but you know us lazy Americans don't like to read movies. Sigh.<br /><br />That said, I saw this before I had ever heard of [●REC] and, to your point, I really enjoyed it. Still haven't seen the original, though I do plan to. As for the DVD cover, I'm normally with you. In this case, however, it's a great shot and doesn't give anything away, unless of course, you've seen [●REC]. I have more issue with that shot and the subsequent occurrence being in the trailer because that does give away lots.Dellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05634519605152190304noreply@blogger.com