Pages

Wednesday, August 14, 2013

Self-Sabotage as an Art Form

Film: Annie Hall
Format: DVD from Northern Illinois University Founders Memorial Library on laptop.

I don’t think there’s a great deal of middle ground on Woody Allen in general. If you like him, you like him a lot and even his weaker films have something worth seeing. If you don’t like him, you really don’t like him in general, although a few of his films might do it for you. I consider myself a fan, not an obsessive one by any stretch of the term, but a fan nonetheless. I tend to like what he puts out. I like his writing a great deal, and I’ve read a couple of his books—Getting Even, Without Feathers, and Side Effects--multiple times. Knowing this, it’s very much embarrassing to admit that until today, I’d never seen Annie Hall.

Yeah, I know. Get your scorn out now. I was so embarrassed by this, in fact, that on the site where I list the full range of films on The List that I marked it as previously-seen just so I didn’t have to hear other people yelling at me for not having watched Annie Hall yet. Why? Well, assuming you’re one of the apparent 95% of humanity that has seen Annie Hall, you likely already know why it’s considered an essential. If you haven’t seen it, well, you really should, even if you end up not liking it (ahem…Chip, I’m looking at you here).

Like the bulk of Allen’s classic work, Annie Hall is as Woody Allen as he ever gets. It’s funny and weird and more philosophical than most comedy. Allen makes references to just about everything, and it’s easy to get lost in his dialogue because of it. But at the same time, he’s not above turning a philosophical discussion into a dick joke. This is a unique talent, and one I appreciate.

Like a good romantic comedy, there’s not a ton of plot here because the plot is entirely about the relationship in question. We learn from the outset that our male lead, Alvy Singer (Woody Allen) has been a year without Annie Hall (Diane Keaton). He’s still trying to make sense of the relationship and the loss of the relationship. It’s this story that then takes up the bulk of the film.

Our couple meets on a tennis court and have their ups and downs. During their relationship, Alvy examines his two failed marriages. The first, to Allison (Carol Kane), tanked because Alvy tanked it. The second, to Robin (Janet Margolin) ended because the sex was bad. At the same time, he investigates Annie’s past relationships, not understanding what she saw in the men she was with. Eventually, the pair breaks up, comes back together, and breaks up again, following the pattern of many a real-life relationship (and it’s appreciated that it’s merely on-again/off-again without repeating the cycle indefinitely). And through it all, Alvy analyzes and tries to figure out what went wrong, where it went wrong, and who was responsible for making it go wrong.

It’s a simple film, so the devil here lies in the details. There are great moments of Alvy looking back into his past, reliving events as a child as an adult now. We see the relationship of his parents as it happened, but through his adult eyes, with Annie and his friend Rob (Tony Roberts) watching. He defends his past actions with the hindsight, clouded memory, and defensivenessof an adult, justifying everything he thinks he thought and felt, trying to square those memories with his present understanding.

The classic Allen character is a neurotic mess who is inexplicably successful in a creative career, and Alvy Singer is no different. He embodies all of the neuroses of Allen at his most Woody Allen while being a successful enough comedian to have appeared on network television shows. But it’s not enough because it’s never enough. It all comes hurtling back to his own insecurities, his own inadequacies, and his own disappointment with everyone else. Annie will never be perfect enough for him, never smart enough or sexual enough, or anything enough to make him happy.

Beyond this, there are great moments throughout—the moment in the movie line where Allen as the director is able to pull Marshall McLuhan out of nowhere to back up his own point of view, the lobster boil, the “spider the size of a Buick” in the bathroom. Admittedly, Allen tends to write dialogue that’s far better than people actually talk, but that’s part of what makes it great. There’s a quip or a one-liner for every possible situation. Sure, that’s not reality, but it’s certainly part of the charm here.

I get it. I understand why Annie Hall is considered a must-see film, and why of all of Allen’s films it is generally considered at or near the top of the heap. Radio Days remains my favorite of his scripts; it’s filled with the same sort of humor but is also filled with a rose-colored nostalgia that I find infectious. Annie Hall is funnier, though. It’s more barbed and more pointed, and much more of that is pointed back at Allen himself. And that’s really what makes it work. It’s cruel in a way good comedy is cruel, but that cruelty is self-inflicted, which somehow makes it all right.

Why to watch Annie Hall: Woody Allen’s writing at its best.
Why not to watch: I’ve got nothing.

11 comments:

  1. I've only seen 4 Woody Allen flicks so far, and my feelings on him are middle ground. My first was Match Point, which is absolutely hated. Then Midnight in Paris, which I absolutely love. Annie Hall was third, and I totally loved it, too. The most recent was Purple Rose of Cairo, which as you already know, I really liked the majority and totally hated the ending (which retroactively made me somewhat dislike the movie as a whole).

    So I've only seen Annie Hall once, and for the 60/60 List a few years ago now, but if I remember correctly, it was in my Top 5 (if not Top 3) on the list for that whole year. Good stuff. I particularly loved the scene at the theater where he steps out of line and talks to the camera about the wannabe film lover in line near him, but then other people start stepping out and talking to the camera with him.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's not often that you see an older classic before I do.

      This one works for me completely on the level of the dialogue. It's consistently good all the way through, and consistently Woody Allen all the way through. What can I say? I love the cadence of the guy's prose.

      Delete
  2. I liked this, mainly because of Diane Keaton's wacky character. Annie Hall has all of Allen's trademarks in it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. When you started out by saying you hadn't seen this I was confused, but then you explained. You've been lying to me! I don't know if I'll ever trust you again!

    (kidding)

    I see that you remember me listing this as one of the great movies that I secretly hate. I won't rehash everything in that post, but for those who didn't read it my problems with the movie were that I so thoroughly disliked both characters that I just wanted the movie to end so that I didn't have to have them around anymore.

    You do have to give me a little credit for sticking with this movie. It took me three tries across three different decades to finally watch this thing all the way to the end...and it's only an hour and a half long. Oh, and being from Maine the lobster scene was just painfully stupid to me. If you drop a lobster it doesn't run around and get behind appliances like a mouse. It will just lie there. It needs water to provide bouyancy for it to move around.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Kim--I don't consider her wacky. She's odd, but not really bizarre. And yeah, it might be the most Allen-y Allen film ever.

      @Chip--Yep. I did it to avoid being yelled at by other people.

      I don't get why you don't like it, but I guess I see why you don't like the characters.

      Delete
  4. "I don't get why you don't like it, but I guess I see why you don't like the characters."

    Well, for me the characters and story are the most important parts of a movie. A single unlikable character can hurt a movie for me if they are prominent enough (i.e. John Goodman's character in The Big Lebowski - another one I am in the minority on because I don't love it.)

    Now imagine having the only two characters in a film that matter both be dislikable separately, and intolerable together. That's what killed any chance for me to like the movie Annie Hall.

    And for what it's worth, this is the only Allen movie that I hate. There have been a few others I didn't care for that much (i.e. Scoop), a few that I was neutral on (i.e. Hannah and Her Sisters), but a majority I have enjoyed to one extent or another. I loved Midnight in Paris; it was my number 3 movie of 2011.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, if everyone agreed on everything, there'd be no reason for us to talk about films. I like Allen's nebbish character, so I like Alvy--mostly because a lot of Allen's work with which I'm familiar is from this time period. I love the jokes, and I love the overall wit of the story.

      And for that matter, I like Annie as a character, too.

      Delete
  5. Good review SJ. Very beautiful movie. However, it's also very funny and touches on a lot of aspects of human line that, even though we are afraid to mean it, are meaningless and dumb. Almost like relationships, however, we all know why we need them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm a little surprised at how funny I found it. I mean, I think Allen is funny, but I sort of expected this to be more serious Allen because of where the story goes. But it's not--it's funny all the way through.

      Delete
  6. It does not happen often but I think I may be on Chip's side here, may his soul rest in peace. I do like the quips and the jokes and there is a lot to like here, but the level of narcissism just ruins it for me. Everything for Alvy is about Alvy and that makes him so intolerable

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't entirely disagree. This is the ultra-form of Allen's nebbish character. He never did it better than this.

      Delete