David Lynch: The Elephant Man
Robert Redford: Ordinary People (winner)
Martin Scorsese: Raging Bull
Richard Rush: The Stunt Man
Roman Polanski: Tess
1980 was a pretty good year for film. I agree with some of the nominations for director for this year, but genuinely wonder about some of the films that were left off. It’s not terribly surprising to me that Irvin Kershner was left off for The Empire Strikes Back, although I think it’s the best of the series. Michael Apted could’ve gotten a nod for Coal Miner’s Daughter, and while Oscar tends to hate horror, I might have tossed in a nod for Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining. I’m guessing it was too much to ask for Ken Russell to be nominated for Altered States.
Weeding through the Nominees
4: I’m going to bump The Stunt Man right away, too. I enjoyed this movie to an extent, but everything that’s enjoyable about this movie comes directly from the performance of Peter O’Toole. He’s great, and there’s a reason he was nominated for this performance. But I can’t really understand the nomination for Richard Rush. The Stunt Man is a perfectly serviceable film, but I can’t see anything in the direction that makes me think “Best Director.” It’s good, but it’s not great.
3: I like what Robert Redford did with Ordinary People, but here I run into the same problem I do with the first two films. This is Redford’s debut as a director, and he’s smart enough with the camera to realize that he’s got a story that can tell itself without him interfering too much. And he doesn’t; he shows a lot of restraint in how he lets this story play out. That sort of restraint isn’t always evident in someone helming a picture for the first time. For showing it, Redford deserves a great deal of credit and our thanks. But Best Director? Not hardly.
My Choices
1: I’ve said before that I view Best Picture as the story being told and Best Director as the way the story is told. Many people disagree with 1980’s Best Picture choice of Ordinary People over Raging Bull. That’s neither here nor there (we’ll get there eventually). What is relevant is that regardless of which story is better, Scorsese told his story better. Raging Bull manages to have a story of genuine substance and tells it with incredible style and class. This is far from my favorite Scorsese film, but it’s the best instance of storytelling in a visual medium in 1980. It would’ve gotten my vote then and still would.
Final Analysis
I can't disagree with you among the nominees, though I haven't seen The Stunt Man.
ReplyDeleteMy very favorite movie of 1980, and one that's probably on my non-existent Top 100 of all time list, is Louis Malle's Atlantic City. I think he should have got a nod at the very least. I also love Bruce Bereford's Breaker Morant and Jonathan Demme's Melvin and Howard. The Academy could have nominated both of those without blushing.
One that's close to my heart is The God's Must Be Crazy but even I wouldn't argue for a nomination for that one.
I always look forward to your Friday posts.
I liked but didn't love Atlantic City. The others I haven't seen, so I don't feel justified in claiming them for the Academy, but your suggestions have been really good in the past on these, so I won't argue.
DeleteIt's easy to forget about the direction in big special effects films, but the direction in The Empire Strikes Back is fantastic. The action sequences are kinetic, thrilling, and yet incredibly easy to follow, unlike virtually every action sequence filmed today. There are many iconic setups and images throughout the film. I think it's easily the best directed, although a New Hope is also good.
ReplyDeleteCan't argue with Raging Bull, though.
I don't disagree. However, it's the middle of what was known to be a trilogy, and that just doesn't win awards. Peter Jackson was nominated as director for the first and third Lord of the Rings films, not the second. Middles of trilogies just don't have the same perceived importance.
DeleteIn fact, I'd go so far as to say that the only reason The Godfather Part II did as well as it did is in large part because no one knew there'd be a third film.
I agree with your top two, Like others I haven't seen The Stunt Man. And you're right on both special effects films and middle films of trilogies.
ReplyDeleteThe Stunt Man is worth it for Peter O'Toole and is otherwise pretty forgettable.
DeleteIt's so easy to agree with you, since you are always always correct! :) Scorsese's Raging Bull is an incredible piece of film making.
ReplyDeleteCan you email the "always correct" thing to my wife? Man, that would make life easier!
DeleteOnly if you can do the same :)
DeleteDeal!
DeleteThere are some great movies among the nominations and among the non-nominated suggestions, and I've seen most of the films mentioned. (Atlantic City is a major blind spot.)
ReplyDeleteBut my favorite 1980 film isn't getting any love! What about Stardust Memories?
Stardust Memories is still a hole in my own viewing. Sadly, I don't tend to nominate the films that I haven't yet seen. Every time I do one of these posts, though, I know that there are some that I'm missing simply because I haven't seen them yet.
DeleteI did not like Raging Bull at all. It is unfair, I know, but I find it hard to appreciate a director of a movie I dislike this much. Maybe it is to his credit that all the characters appear so unsympathetic? But then again, I get the feeling that he actually liked them. Kubrick created a horribly unlikeable character in The Shining, but I feel much better with that. In an open field, this is my candidate for Best Director.
ReplyDeleteI don't think it's a terrible choice, especially when you consider that Kubrick never won a Best Director Oscar and could have for at least half a dozen movies.
Delete