Saturday, May 2, 2026

What I've Caught Up With, April 2026 Part 1

I watched 33 movies in April, which means that in terms of the goal of 400 movies on the year, I was exactly on track—one movie per day, plus three movies. So, while I didn’t fall behind on that goal in April, I also didn’t catch up any. Baby steps, though, right? Treading water is better than falling further behind.

What I’ve Caught Up With, April 2026 Part 1
Film: Valhalla Rising (2009)

A one-eyed Viking warrior (Mads Mikkelsen) is a thrall forced to fight for his survival. Finding a stone arrowhead, he effects his escape, killing his captors and heading out on his own, followed by a young thrall (Maarten Stevenson). They eventually fall in with a group of Christian Norsemen who are planning on a crusade of sorts and decide to go to the Holy Land. Their navigation is a bit off, though, and they end up somewhere in North America. It’s bleak and nihilistic, the way any film that is ultimately about some sort of colonialism should be. This feels like it was made in the heart of Nicolas Winding Refn’s peak period, and it also seems to fit with his standard vision.

Film: Dalek’s Invasion Earth 2150 A.D. (1966)

There are plenty of classic Dr. Who villains, but perhaps none are more iconic than the Daleks. This film has the Doctor played by Peter Cushing (who would have been a great Doctor in the show) traveling to 2150 with his niece Louise (Jill Curzon) and his granddaughter Susan (Roberta Tovey) only to discover that the Earth has been conquered by the Daleks. Hilarity ensues. Aside from having a character called The Doctor who travels through time in a T.A.R.D.I.S. and fighting against Daleks, this doesn’t really fit with any continuity of the show that I can see. It’s mildly entertaining but feels necessary only for the most die-hard completist.

Film: A Taste of Honey (1961)

The world may be filled with angry young men, but there are also plenty of angry young women. Most of them, though, don’t have Rita Tushingham’s huge eyes or oddly-shaped face. Jo (Tushingham) is a rebellious teen who has an uncomfortable relationship with her wanton and narcissistic mother Helen (Dora Bryan). Jo has a brief affair with a Black sailor named Jimmy (Paul Danquah). When she is predictably abandoned, she ends up teaming up with a gay man named Geoffrey (Murray Melvin). Nothing good happens to anyone in A Taste of Honey. It’s a bleak film, but it also feels very current in a lot of ways. Tushingham is an unusual screen presence—she looks oddly elfin but sounds like a dockworker.

Film: Beneath the Planet of the Apes (1970)

The success of the original Planet of the Apes movie made sequels inevitable. Beneath the Planet of the Apes gives us a new astronaut in Brent (James Franciscus), sent to see what happened to the original set of astronauts. What he finds is a society of humans living underground. These humans have developed telepathy but are otherwise helpless. They also happen to worship a fully functional atomic bomb. This is a fun continuation of the story, and honestly not much more ridiculous than the first story. It’s difficult to call it “good,” though—but it certainly fits in with the Cold War era feeling of eventual destruction by atomic power. I’m certain I’ve seen this before, but it’s probably been almost literally a half-century. Glory be to The Bomb!

Film: Chi-Raq (2015)

In my experience, when Spike Lee relies too heavily on other material, we get films we don’t need like Da Sweet Blood of Jesus or Oldboy. Chi-Raq is the exception here. Lee uses the outrageous gun violence in the U.S. stand as his backdrop for a modern updating of Lysistrata. Essentially, the wives and girlfriends of the gang members in the tougher neighborhoods of Chicago decide that the way to get their men to the table for a cease fire is to stop sex completely. The cast is eclectic and solid, with Teyonah Parris in the title role. The fact that a lot of this is delivered in verse is surprising, as is the casting of John Cusak as a preacher in a predominantly Black neighborhood. Samuel L. Jackson as the Greek chorus is worth the price of admission. It’s preachier than Lee usually is, though…and that’s a lot.

Film: Bicentennial Man (1999)

Based loosely on a story from Isaac Asimov, Bicentennial Man is an unusual film in a lot of respects, but ultimately one that isn’t everything it could be. An android dubbed Andrew (Robin Williams) develops a personality and over the course of a couple of centuries, tries to become human. The problem is that this is a movie that doesn’t know what it wants to be. Is it a Pinocchio story? Is it ultimately a romance? Is it about free will or what it means to be human? It desperately wants to be all of these things at the same time. The cast is good—lots of people show up for a bit or a scene or two—but this is a showcase for Williams, who frankly has been better.

Film: The Safety of Objects (2001)

Based on a series of short stories, The Safety of Objects shows us the interconnected lives of several families in a neighborhood, each with their own problems and pains that move them. In a lot of ways, this feels like it wants to be a new version of American Beauty but it dips into strange territory with the abduction of a child, although fortunately not for anything disturbing. This is another movie where you show up for the cast—Glenn Close, Kristen Stewart, Dermot Mulroney, Patricia Clarkson, Robert Klein, Timothy Olyphant, and more. It’s good, but it feels a bit like it wants to be a modern Peyton Place, where we’re supposed to be shocked by what goes on behind closed doors.

6 comments:

  1. I've seen a few of these. Valhalla Rising I think is the 2nd film by NWR that I have seen yet I really enjoyed for how brutal it is. The Safety of Objects I liked while I really enjoyed A Taste of Honey as it was an influential film in Britain's Kitchen Sink dramas. I have also seen Bicentennial Man which I did not like. I found it to be really boring and overlong.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Valhalla Rising is the fifth Refn film I've seen--Drive and The Neon Demon are interesting watches. Bronson isn't great, but Tom Hardy is great in it. Only God Forgives is pretty avoidable. I really need to see the Pusher trilogy.

      The Safety of Objects is one of those films that I don't know that I would need to see again, but I liked it well enough. Same with A Taste of Honey. Bicentennial Man is entirely avoidable, though.

      Delete
    2. I've seen all of NWR's projects except for Too Old to Die Young and Copenhagen Cowboys as I widely recommend the Pusher trilogy.

      Delete
    3. It's on the list. I just haven't gotten to it yet.

      Delete
  2. I thought A Taste of Honey was terrifically done without really enjoying it. As you said it’s grim but that was all the rage when the movie came out. Rita Tushingham is fantastic and carries the film but even in the unconventional 60’s her looks and mannerisms may have been just a bit too quirky to carry her to full fledged stardom. Especially when she was competing with Julie Christie, Vanessa & Lynn Redgrave, Glenda Jackson and Susannah York among others who had their own quirks but also massive wells of talent and more conventionally adaptable looks.

    Beneath the Planet of the Apes was fun and Franciscus was less of a showboating hambone than Charlton Heston (not that I didn’t enjoy that aspect of Chuckle’s talent, but it was a very specific gift that only worked for him) so the focus was more on the plot than the lead.

    I waited for years to watch Bicentennial Man because of negative word of mouth but eventually I thought with that cast how bad could it possibly be? Turns out quite bad! I didn’t hate it because I went in with a lower expectation, but it was very disappointing to see so much talent wasted.

    I love how odd The Safety of Objects is! I walked into the theatre to see it more or less blind on the strength of Glenn Close, Patricia Clarkson and Mary Kay Place’s names and they didn’t disappoint. Did it all work and even make sense? No, but it held my interest and surprised me at different points and the acting was superior.

    I’m not much of a Spike Lee fan, the only film of his I’ve completely enjoyed is “Inside Man” though there are others that I thought were decent, Chi-Raq sounds like an interesting concept, but his execution of intriguing ideas doesn’t always work for me.

    I never got aboard the whole Doctor Who-verse train, so Daleks’ Invasion Earth 2150 A.D. was not made for me.

    I’ve never had a burning desire to see Valhalla Rising but if I ran across it, I might give it a chance. I think I read a summary of it once and it recalled the dreadful Lee Majors movie The Norseman and that was enough to put me off.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Rita Tushingham is genuinely odd-looking. It's not a comment on her talent, but it does likely indicate why she never became a major star despite having the talent to pull it off. The movies, after all, have always been superficial on some level. Both A Taste of Honey and The Safety of Objects are films that I'm happy to have seen but probably won't see again.

      The Planet of the Apes movies are of varying quality. Beneath is decent, if not a patch on the original, but none of the follow-ups are.

      Bicentennial Man is a huge disappointment, given the cast involved. There's a story here, but it's not this chaotic mess.

      The Daleks movie isn't going to make you a Doctor Who fan, and Chi-Raq won't make you like Spike Lee. I do like Lee's work in general, although there are some exceptions. Inside Man is very much his most entertaining film, at least that I have seen.

      Valhalla Rising isn't necessary, but it's good.

      Delete