Emmanuelle Riva: Amour
Quvenzhane Wallis: Beasts of the Southern Wild
Naomi Watts: The Impossible
Jennifer Lawrence: Silver Linings Playbook (winner)
Jessica Chastain: Zero Dark Thirty
What’s Missing
There are a bunch of movies I like from 2012, but it’s not a great year for Best Actress. Of the five nominees, I’m really only comfortable with three of them being on the list and see only one clear winner. The problem is that many of the movies from 2012 that I like: The Avengers, Moonrise Kingdom, Cloud Atlas are far more ensemble casts than they are featuring a single strong female performance. Even with Moonrise Kingdom and how enchanting I found Kara Hayward, she’s only barely a leading role. Isabelle Huppert was deserving of a nomination for Amour, but probably a supporting one. I hated Ruby Sparks, so I’m not including Zoe Kazan. Dredd’s Olivia Thirlby and Lena Headey were great, but not in a typical Oscar movie. Emma Watson for The Perks of Being a Wallflower, maybe, but that’s based on reputation because I haven’t seen the film. My inherent dislike of Aubrey Plaza probably keeps her off my list for Safety Not Guaranteed. In fact, the only addition I feel completely comfortable with is Sofia Oria in Blancanieves.
Weeding through the Nominees
5. Goodbye to Naomi Watts and The Impossible right away. The main reason for this is that I simply don’t recall Naomi Watts in this movie much at all. I remember the special effects (they were excellent) and I remember feeling manipulated by the screenplay. I also remember thinking that for a disaster film that happened in Asia, this film was extremely American- and Euro-centric. My distaste for some of the issues this movie brought up for me may well be coloring this ranking, but I’m human and I can’t help that.
4. I’m probably getting rid of Jessica Chastain and Zero Dark Thirty. This isn’t a bad movie and Chastain is decent in it, but there are so many overarching issues I have with the movie that I’m sure how I move her up higher in the queue. It’s interesting that the role of the lone rebel working against the system is given to a woman in a military film, but Chastain’s role is pretty much exactly the same as plenty of other roles you and I have seen in our lives. It’s a cookie cutter role with the addition of breasts.
3. Placing positions two and three were the hardest for me with this award, and on another day, I may flip them. I’m going to put Quvenzhane Wallis and Beasts of the Southern Wild here for one specific reason. Wallis is far and away the best thing in the movie, and in my opinion, she’s really the only good thing in the movie. Ultimately, this is my least favorite of these five films, but Wallis manages to transcend what I found to be a weak and uninteresting story and screenplay. I hope she has a great career and a ton of nominations ahead of her, but she’s not above third for this group.
2. Actually, I’m probably putting Jennifer Lawrence in second for a second reason beyond liking Silver Linings Playbook more than I liked Beasts of the Southern Wild. Lawrence had a good year in 2012 with both this film and The Hunger Games. Here, she showed that her nomination for Winter’s Bone was not a fluke. It’s easy to dislike her win because of how ubiquitous she became in the years that followed, but it’s a good and meaty performance in a good and interesting film. I like it and I get her win, but I don’t agree with it.
My Choices
1. My vote and my private Oscar goes to Emmanuelle Riva and her heartbreaking and beautiful work in Amour. Riva’s performance is, in my opinion, one of the truly great acting performances of this current decade. I found it incredibly affecting, the sort of character who stays with the viewer for days and weeks after the viewing. Riva died last month, and I should probably go hunt down more of her movies, because Amour showed that she was one of the most capable actresses to ever stand in front of a camera. I’d have given her this Oscar and make no apologies for it.
Final Analysis
We don't see too eye to eye on this overall other than several of the nominees didn't belong in the lineup. I'd cut out Watts, Wallis and Lawrence, who I thought was so great in Winter's Bone and rather meh in Silver Linings, and only keep Chastain as a dead last fifth place finisher.
ReplyDeleteWhich leaves on Riva who would be my runner up but I'd fill those other slots with Keira Knightley in Anna Karenina, Marion Cotillard in Rust and Bone and the woman who would be my winner in a walk Rachel Weisz in The Deep Blue Sea. The movie was often chilly and distant but she gave a performance of remarkable depth and power, it was my favorite acting performance in any category that year.
There's always a risk when I do any of these that I haven't seen a number of worthy contenders. In this case, I haven't seen any of the three you mention, so I can't really comment.
DeleteKeira Knightley is often hit and miss, but she found the perfect role in Seeking A Friend For The End Of The World and would have deserved a nomination. I liked Ruby Sparks a LOT more than you did, and I would not have minded a nomination for Zoe Kazan - that was a brave and vivid performance.
ReplyDeleteFrom among the nominees I've so far seen the Watts, Chastain and Lawrence movies, and I would agree with your ranking of those three. Watts' performance is very physical, Chastain is more cerebral, but Lawrence gets the nod thanks to her likeability-with-an-edge in Silver Linings Playbook.
I can't recommend Amour highly enough. It's gutting and not the kind of movie you'll want to sit through a second time, but it's a hell of a performance, and one that sticks to you for days.
DeleteFor what it's worth, Amour is the best film of 2012 in my opinion, at least for now.
I should have also mentioned that I fundamentally disagree with having children like Quvenzhane Wallis compete in this category. She was 9 years old at the time. A separate, non-competitive category to recognize promising young actors (say 17 years and under) is needed. The Academy should stop throwing kids into the pit with seasoned adults.
ReplyDeleteI don't entirely disagree. The Academy also needs to recognize stunt work and voice acting.
DeleteI didn't see Amour, but I believe you. I also never saw The Impossible. I agree that Wallis (and the special effects and/or visuals, from what I remember) were the best part of Beasts, but I still didn't care for the film overall, and I've seen better child performances that never got nominated. Lawrence was great in Silver Linings, and she does have the chops when it counts. I also really liked Zero Dark Thirty quite a bit, and I liked Chastain in it. But I can see what you're saying about a cookie cutter role (with breasts).
ReplyDeleteAs far as Emma Watson, Perks is an *excellent* movie, but she's far from the strongest aspect of it. Her American accent is mildly distracting, as she's still getting used to doing it. So while I highly recommend the movie, I can't say her performance is better than the ones here.
That's completely fair regarding Watson. Sometimes I have to make a guess or two when it comes to potential nominations, particularly on more recent years.
DeleteAmour is not the sort of film to see lightly. It's a devastating story, as befits director Michael Haneke. In many way, though, it's his most human film, and his most beautiful.
For once I've actually seen the whole group of nominees. For me, Jennifer Lawrence was good in SLP but it wasn't an exceptional performance. Agree Riva should have won and by the disappointed look on her face that night it looked like she knew it was her last chance of winning.
ReplyDeleteThe Academy makes this mistake plenty of times. After all, Peter O'Toole went 0-for-8 and Roger Deakins is 0-for-13. It's one of the reasons I do these write-ups. Someone needs to fix this shit.
Delete