Thursday, January 10, 2019

Tropic Thunder Reference

Film: I Am Sam
Format: DVD from Sycamore Public Library on The New Portable.

I’m not sure where to start with I Am Sam (or i am sam as it is written in the film and on the DVD case). It’s a movie that is simultaneously heartwarming and terribly disturbing. It’s one of the high points of Sean Penn’s career and also the sort of film that, once you dig below the clear emotional manipulation of the story, is nothing but problems. It’s a movie where the emotional pull is very clear, and at the same time so obviously wrong that it’s difficult to understand how the film was made.

Even if you haven’t seen I Am Sam, you almost certainly know at least one of the major plot points; Sam Dawson (Penn) is mentally challenged. We’re told early on that he essentially has the mental capacity of a seven-year-old. Coincidentally, Sam has a daughter named Lucy (Dakota Fanning) who is about to turn seven. Sam was abandoned by Lucy’s mother, a homeless woman, when Lucy was born. He works at Starbucks and raises Lucy with the help of his equally challenged friends and Lucy’s piano teacher (Dianne Wiest), an agoraphobic who lives across the hall from him.

Naturally, this is about as far as Sam can go as a parent before it’s clear that he’s not up to the task of raising Lucy on his own. A couple of incidents puts Sam in court with Lucy taken away from him. Not knowing what to do, he contacts Rita (Michelle Pfeiffer), a high-priced attorney who initially attempts to foist Sam off on another lawyer. Eventually, though, Rita decides to take Sam’s case pro bono when she determines that she has a reputation she’d like to soften.

What this means in terms of the film is that Rita is struggling with her family in many ways. She is always working, and so is her husband, and her son Willy (Chase MacKenzie Bebak) is caught in the middle, essentially abandoned. It is, perhaps, the most allegorical thing I’ve seen in a film in a long time. Rita is a fit parent because she is smart and makes a lot of money, but she ignores her son and her marriage for the sake of her job. Sam, mentally deficient and struggling, earning $8.00/hour, loves his daughter and does everything he can for her even though she is rapidly becoming much more intellectually advanced than he is. I didn’t need my English degree to see the message here.

And really, that’s the major problem with I Am Sam. This is a situation that is so untenable that I kind of question the motive behind the film. It’s clear that we’re supposed to be rooting for Sam because he truly does love his daughter and we’re supposed to dive in head-first with the idea that, as the Beatles-remake/cover soundtrack assures us, love is all you need. But it’s clearly not. Try as he will and as much as we may emotionally want that, there’s no way that Sam is a fit parent.

In this respect, I Am Sam is incredibly unfair. It’s so manipulative that it’s almost unconscionable. We’re supposed to be rocking back and forth in tears when Sam is doing his best on the witness stand because we’re supposed to think that keeping Lucy with him is the best possible choice. And I can’t imagine how Sam would have been allowed to be the only caregiver of a newborn, let alone a seven-year-old child. We’re supposed to think this is all so terribly unfair when it so obviously is not. We’re supposed to see the other attorney (Richard Schiff) as such a bad guy—and on a visceral level it’s impossible not to think that—and he’s not.

And yes, there’s no movie without this, and yes, it’s completely unfair. In the real world, I can’t imagine this story actually happening, and I’m the sort of person who will happily wax rhapsodic about the verisimilitude of movies like Dredd or the Harry Potter films.

I should talk about the performances here, since Penn’s is why this appeared on my radar. Penn, for whatever baggage he brings to a production is really very good. One of the things he does extremely well is play the part as honestly as he can. It would be a temptation to make Sam something he isn’t or to play him either for laughs or for much more pathos than the role deserves. Penn doesn’t; his portrayal is honest without being unfairly noble. This is probably the reason he was nominated. There’s no real judgment in his portrayal of Sam, and it’s honestly one of the best things I’ve seen him do.

As much as I desperately want to love I Am Sam, I can’t. I respect the hell out of virtually all of the performances, and it’s a hell of a good cast. That cast includes Laura Dern as a foster mom and has Brent Spiner showing up for a cup of coffee as a shoe salesman. There’s so much here that I want to like, but the premise of the film bothers me so much that I just can’t get beyond it.

Why to watch I Am Sam: Sean Penn is really good in this.
Why not to watch: Honestly, the plot is really problematic.


  1. I've only ever seen the previews for this movie, but based on your assessment, I think I might give this one a pass, despite the decent performances.

    1. You're safe in that position, man. I continually felt a combination of creepy and weird watching it.

  2. I felt for Sam and the whole situation, and Penn was extraordinary-matched by the entire cast, but ultimately it is very manipulative and I felt that the whole while watching the film.

    I don't mind that so much in something like "Iron Will" where the manipulation is in the service of a sense of adventure and rooting for the hero and is therefore a sort of no harm no foul situation but in something like this were the stakes are the welfare of a child it's a whole other ball of wax.