Format: Internet video on laptop.
Adolysti connected me to the remaining bits of The Rogue Song when I posted the review for Jojo Rabbit, thinking I was mainly done with the giant Oscars list. Alas, I was not, and wanting something like that little additional bit of closure, I figured I would watch what I could of the film. It’s an interesting thing—only about 30 minutes of actual footage remain, but there is a complete soundtrack for the film. So, what does remain has been pieced together with stills and interstitial titles to give us something like a sense of the entire film.
The Rogue Song is very much a musical, and that becomes clear almost at the moment the film starts. The story takes place in pre-revolutionary Russia (roughly 1910). A bandit leader named Yegor (Lawrence Tibbett) chances upon Princess Vera (Catherine Dale Owen) at an in. The two are attracted to each other, but find that there are a number of impediments to their relationship. Vera’s companion (Nance O’Neil) gives Yegor a string of pearls for being amusing, but then accuses him of stealing them when he refuses to romance her.
A much bigger problem comes from the relationship between Vera’s brother, Prince Serge (Ullrich Haupt) and Yegor’s sister Nadja (Florence Lake). “Relationship” is far too nice for the reality of this, actually. In fact, Nadja accuses Serge of violating her, and covered in shame, Nadja kills herself. Yegor kills Serge in retaliation, throwing yet another spanner in the works of the film’s central romance.
Essentially, Yegor is a singing version of Robin Hood. In fact, a great deal of the film plays like a musical Robin Hood, at least in terms of the way Yegor is depicted. There are, clearly, elements of Romeo and Juliet here as well. It’s a rough mix of the two stories, and somehow a great deal less than either of them.
There are a number of problems with The Rogue Song, not all of which are the fault of the film. One of these is the fact—and there is no escaping this—that Lawrence Tibbett looks like Jack Black circa Nacho Libre and minus about 50 pounds. Same goofy little mustache, same curly mop of hair. That’s not Tibbett’s fault, but it’s impossible not to see.
Tibbett himself sounds like Howard Keel. I mean that his singing voice sounds a great deal like Howard Keel, which is very clearly a compliment. I also mean that his speaking voice sounds like Howard Keel’s singing voice, which is a bit hard to take. He sounds…robust all the time, and very much as if he is playing a role, which he is. Everything he says sounds as if it were immediately proceeded by “Ha ha ha!” even when it wasn’t.
There’s also the issue of Laurel and Hardy. Of the old school film comedians, Stan Laurel and Oliver Hardy are probably the least remembered and beloved with the possible exception of the Ritz Brothers. Most people would rank them behind Chaplin, Lloyd, Keaton, the Marx Brothers, and Abbott and Costello, and perhaps unfairly. They were a fine comedy duo, but their particular style of comedy doesn’t translate well to something where most of the visuals have been lost. Right now, The Rogue Song is more a radio drama than anything else, and that’s very much to the detriment of the boys’ addition to the film.
Their presence is a bigger problem, though. Frankly, they don’t fit tonally. Apparently, Laurel and Hardy were added to the movie because of their star power at the time, and their purpose is to add a great deal of slapstick humor to a film that involves rape and murder. That seems ill advised at best. Even if it did work tonally, the duo was added after the fact as something of an afterthought. They appear in only one scene with Tibbett, and so in many ways they almost feel like they are in a different movie.
As for the music, well, it was fine. I’ve become much more accepting of musicals over the past decade and there are plenty that I enjoy a great deal. My issue here is that The Rogue Song is very operatic, and that’s never (or at least very rarely) going to play well with me. It’s a reminder that this was in something of fashion at the time—Tibbett was an opera singer, and thus would have been very much in demand for this sort of role. It’s also a reminder that this trend didn’t last long. This was Tibbett’s debut film, and aside from a television appearance in the early ‘50s, his film career was done by 1936.
I didn’t really enjoy The Rogue Song a great deal, but I am very pleased to have seen it.
Why to watch The Rogue Song: Because we need to respect the past.
Why not to watch: What’s here isn’t fantastic, and what’s missing is most of it.
The quality of that film doesn't look good. I'm sure there's something interesting there but the quality of it is a real turn-off.ReplyDelete
I found black and white stills that look pretty good, but the Technicolor footage, well...not so much.Delete
You're pretty safe missing this one.
I haven't gotten to this yet but I will for completeness sake. My hopes will be realistically adjusted knowing that most of it is missing.ReplyDelete
The piecing together is at least a nice try, much like when they filled the gaps in the Judy Garland version of A Star is Born though that was on a much smaller scale it helped clarify the continuity.
I've seen some of the few films Lawrence Tibbett made and your description fits what I've seen. Sounds like the opera/stage training, some performers just can't adjust between the mediums.
Yep--Lawrence Tibbett seems like he's singing even when he's speaking. It makes some sense for the time, but it dates the film so much for a modern viewer.Delete
Perhaps I live in a Laurel and Hardy Boomer bubble, but they are as beloved to me as any of the great teams (Most of whom I also love). Of course, I grew up when they still showed all of their Hal Roach movies on television. They are also unique, in that their silent movie personalities translated perfectly to talkies. Did you see the recent “Stan and Ollie” movie? Very moving.ReplyDelete
I haven't seen the biopic--it came out to almost no fanfare.Delete
They do seem like a cultural icon that we've lost, which is a damn shame.