Friday, March 2, 2012


Film: Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid
Format: DVD from Rockford Public Library on kick-ass portable DVD player.

There’s a real problem associated with writing about a movie like Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. The problem is that it is widely considered one of the greats of American film, an opinion (spoiler alert) with which I agree. I generally write a good 700+ words on every film I watch, but this one leaves me in the position of having to write that much without feeling like I have anything to add to the conversation. Everything I’d want to say about BCatSK has already been said, and by people better versed in film and smarter than I. And yet, Dear Reader, I plunge ahead.

The film catches up to our two eponymous heroes, Butch Cassidy (Paul Newman) and the Sundance Kid (Robert Redford) as they reunite with the Hole-in-the-Wall Gang. Butch reasserts his leadership over the gang and they plan to rob a train on both legs of its journey—once coming and once going. The first robbery goes relatively smoothly, aside from the presence of Woodcock (George Furth), who refuses to let the robbers have the money. They get the money anyway and celebrate at a brothel, which also gives Sundance a chance to meet up with his girl, Etta Place (Katherine Ross), a schoolteacher.

Things change on the next robbery. The gang attempts to rob the same train on its return trip, but discover a much larger, more intimidating safe this time. They use far too much dynamite and blow the entire train car. And then things get really bad. Another train arrives, and releases a posse dead set on catching Butch and the Kid. Over time, the pair discovers this posse contains some of the best trackers and lawmen in the West. To give themselves a little space, they reunite with Etta, head to New York, and then catch a boat down to Bolivia, which Butch believes is a robber’s paradise.

And it sort of is, but it’s not too long before Los Bandidos Yanquis are wanted everywhere in Bolivia, too. They attempt to go straight, fail, and soon discover that this life of crime and gunfighting might have a definitive ending, and it might be soon.

There are plenty of key scenes in this film, and these key scenes are a big reason why this film is rightfully considered one of the greatest Westerns ever made and one of the best American films of its (or any other) decade. The fight between Butch and Harvey Logan (Ted Cassidy) is a stroke of comedic brilliance. Harvey, much larger and meaner than Butch, complains when Butch wants to set rules for their knife fight. Butch uses Harvey’s confusion to kick him in the groin and then rabbit punch him into unconsciousness. It almost looks planned by the characters, but the genius is that it comes across as a spontaneous moment.

Then there’s the relationships between the three main characters—Butch, Sundance, and Etta. Etta is torn between the two men. While she sleeps with Sundance, she allows herself to be romanced by Butch, setting up a strange love triangle in which the three players are aware of and relatively comfortable with the parts of the other two. Nothing shows this as well as the bicycle scene, with Butch clowning on a bike for Etta’s amusement after Etta has spent the night in Sundance’s arms.

And there’s more, of course. There’s the cliff jumping scene, the marvelous montage of the trip to New York as well as another montage of the bank robberies in Bolivia. There is the excellent banter between Butch and Sundance that creates almost a sibling relationship between the two men; they feel free to pick on each other, but also stand by each other to the end. And then there is the end, which is one of the best in film history, a freeze-framed moment of time that allows us to see our heroes as we want to see them, but also lets us know precisely what their fate would be if we let the cameras roll.

More than anything, the reason this film works as well as it does is not the beautiful cinematography, the entertaining story, or the dialogue between our two antiheroes. It is the incredible chemistry between our two leads. There is a sense that these two men are not actors on a set or on location, but two guys who have known each other for years. They are comfortable with each other and completely natural with each other. It’s a chemistry they would explore again in The Sting, another period piece that may just be a little better than this one. But it suggests that even with a weak story and a sub-par script, the Newman/Redford duo would be worth watching for as long as they let us watch.

That, more than anything is the reason this film has remained a must-watch since its release, and that chemistry is still in evidence.

Why to watch Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid: It’s one of the best movies you’ll ever see.
Why not to watch: Because your world is dark and filled with hate with no chance of joy.


  1. If Etta's not available, I'd like to have a chance at Joy.

  2. The only thing I didn't like about this movie was the New York montage sequence that seems to go on FOREVER and feels totally out of place. And then, of course, the "raindrops" sequence goes on a wee bit too long. Otherwise, it's fantastic.

  3. I like the montage, although on this watch, I'll admit I liked it more as a concept than a reality. Still, I think it ties the opening sepia-tone and the closing freeze frame nicely.

    Of the two montages, though, I prefer the bank robbing in Bolivia one. It's a lot more fun.

  4. Yes, the chemistry is there alright, I can't decide which is better, The Sting, or this one.
    Cool that they named the film festival after the Sundance kid.

    Have you made a conscious decision not to include a rating score on your blog? Would be helpful when reading.

  5. Yeah, I made the decision when I started that my reviews should be good enough that you can determine a rough idea of my score by reading them. I understand the appeal of a numerical rating. I just wanted to go in a different direction with this.

  6. I enjoyed it more than The Sting and like the robbery scene,when one of them forgets how to say it and looks up the dictionary in the bank,it's hilarious.Also the memorable line:"what the hell are these guys??" when they are closely followed and could not get away.

  7. I think I'm a little more attuned to The Sting, but that might simply be that I saw it first.

  8. I saw this movie a few times over the years on broadcast TV when I was growing up and I liked it every time. Some time in the 80s I saw a Siskel and Ebert episode where Gene Siskel just went off on how crappy he felt this film was, especially the song in the middle of it. Of course, the man's favorite film was inexplicably Saturday Night Fever, so I never really understood where he was coming from that much.

    I had to laugh at your "Why not to watch" comment and that inspired this comment about Siskel.

  9. Siskel, of course, was human, and thus capable of being very, very wrong. On this film, he was wrong.

    Still, I never agree with any critic 100%. Hell, Ebert gave The Usual Suspects fewer than two stars.

    Honestly, I don't know how someone can not like this film.