Format: DVD from NetFlix on rockin’ flatscreen.
When you see the poster for 1972’s The Other, it comes as no surprise that we’re going to be diving into the “evil child” subgenre of horror film. We will be treading much the same ground as in films like The Bad Seed or Village of the Damned. This is a member of another odd little subgenre, though: the evil twin movie. Yep. Two subgenres for the price of one.
Our twins are Niles and Holland Perry (played respectively by Chris and Martin Udvarnoky, neither of whom ever made another movie). We learn quickly that Niles is the good twin and Holland is the, well, initially mischievous twin and eventually the evil, murderous one. The two boys live in a farmhouse with their infirm mother (Diana Muldaur), their Aunt Vee and Uncle George (Norma Connolly and Lou Frizzell), the boys’ pregnant older sister Torrie (Jenny Sullivan), her husband Rider (John Ritter!), and their grandmother Ada (Uta Hagen). Also in the house is their cousin Russell (Clarence Crow), who they call Piggy Lookadoo. There’s no love lost between the twins and Russell.
Things seem normal until they really aren’t. Niles has an old tobacco tin that he uses to store various treasures including a ring. We discover eventually what is so important about the ring, but I’m not going to drop into spoiler territory with that. Russell discovers that Niles has the ring, though, and shortly after that, Russell, while jumping off the hayloft into the hay below, lands on the upright pitchfork.
Tragedy never seems far away from the Perry family. Shortly after this, their neighbor, Mrs. Rowe (Portia Nelson) dies of a heart attack and goes for a few days without discovery. Their mother finds the ring and confronts Niles about it, and she takes a tumble down the stairs and is partially paralyzed.
The other thing that is worth noting here is the relationship between Niles and his grandmother Ada. Ada has instructed him in something she calls “The Great Game.” Essentially, Niles is capable of projecting himself outside of his body and into something else, allowing him to see what other people are doing while hidden (he uses this to learn a magician’s secrets) or to experience life as a bird or other animal. Around the midway point of the film, we discover that Niles has the ability to project himself into quite a bit more than that, but again, that gets us into spoiler territory.
One of the most interesting things about The Other is that Niles and Holland are never on screen at the same time. They share a number of scenes, but we never see both of them in the same shot. This led to a number of people suspecting that director Robert Mulligan had used one child in a dual role, but that was evidently not the case. The mid-film reveal makes this decision an interesting and telling one, and it demonstrates that Mulligan may have put more than a little thought into what is essentially a cheap thrill movie.
That it’s cheap doesn’t really affect the film that much. No, there are other places where The Other doesn’t quite work that well. The big thing is the entire idea behind the Great Game. I understand why it is included here, but for where the plot wants to go, it’s not really necessary. It’s not used that much and serves mainly to give the story a connection to the supernatural that it doesn’t really need. Very little would need to change in the film if it were eliminated entirely, and the big reveal would work pretty much exactly the same way. In fact, it might even be more effective without it.
It’s also surprisingly tame. I’m not expecting a full face-melting gore fest here, but for a film that trades on horror, we don’t really ever see anything. The decision seems to be of the nature that what we don’t see is more terrifying than what we do, but what we don’t see here is pretty much everything. There’s room for a little more, even just for shock value in a couple of places.
So where does that leave us? It leaves us with a film that wants to be more than it is. The Other isn’t a bad film. It’s just not that interesting and it could be a lot more than it is. It’s a bit too tame and a bit too staid to be scary, and it’s too little of anything else to be much of anything else.
Why to watch The Other: A good entry in the “evil child” subgenre.
Why not to watch: It tries for upsetting more than scary and doesn’t really get there.
Sounds a bit like "The Omen" with a Stephen King flavoring.ReplyDelete
It kind of feels like it might have influenced The Shining a little bit. It's not a coincidence that when I put in the DVD and the trailers started playing immediately, the first two were for The Omen remake and The Omen original.Delete
You read my mind: "The Shining" is what I was thinking of.Delete
It's not nearly as developed in terms of what it does in the story and what it actually is. I'd love to say it's derivative of King's work, except that it came first.Delete
Hello there! Been a fan of your letterboxd for a while and just now decided to comment on this blog which is great.ReplyDelete
It's bizarre that this was directed by the same person who directed To Kill a Mockingbird, huh? That film had much, much better child acting than this.
Yeah, it's one of those weird director things, like realizing that George Miller directed both Mad Max: Fury Road and Babe: Pig in the City.Delete
Welcome in, by the way. If you haven't looked at what I do on Mondays and Fridays, those tend to be interesting posting days.
This isn't the most riveting chiller but at least for the first viewing it has an eerie sense of dread. It also has that interesting mix of casting. Uta Hagen is so renowned for her book Respect for Acting and made so few film appearances it was a great opportunity to see her work. Then to see John Ritter so early in his career and I've always been a big fan of Diana Muldaur. I won't go running back to see it anytime soon but didn't think it was bad when I watched it.ReplyDelete
I didn't think it was terrible. It's just not that great.Delete
I should have probably put this in the review above--one of my sisters loved this movie and built it up in my head years ago, so I was expecting something a lot closer to Rosemary's Baby in its effects. It's not in the same league, so that might fuel my disappointment a little.