Format: DVD from personal collection on laptop.
This is a straight-up noir, too. I suppose technically it’s a modern noir, but eliminate the few moments of nudity and the sexual content and there’s very little in this film that wouldn’t be at home with something luridly titled from 1952. All of the noir points are hit and hit hard here. We’ve got an attractive woman with a heart of stone, criminal enterprises, sex, detectives, an amateur in way over his head, and a dedicated sense of moral ambiguity. If only it had been filmed in black-and-white, it would slide into the canon of the period without question.
Bridget Gregory (Fiorentino) works as the slave driver and whip master for a firm selling commemorative coins. Her husband Clay (Bill Pullman) is a doctor who deals drugs on the side. As it happens, the Gregorys have taken out a six-figure loan from a loan shark, and to repay the debt, Clay has made a large-scale deal of medical-grade cocaine. When he brings home the score, far more than enough to pay off the loan shark and still net a tidy profit, Bridget waits until he hops in the shower and runs off with the cash. She winds up in a small town in upstate New York, contacts a lawyer about a divorce, changes her name, and starts a sex-only relationship with a local named Mike Swale (Peter Berg).
While Bridget is dealing with her new identity as “Wendy Kroy,” her husband is dealing with problems of his own. The first of these is a broken thumb courtesy of the loan shark. The second is Bridget’s location. He hires a private detective named Harlan (Bill Nunn) to help him recover the cash. Harlan manages to trace a call from her to narrow down her area code while Clay figures out her new name. Bridget has a talent for writing backwards, and since “Wendy Kroy” is almost the reverse of “New York,” he sends Harlan out to find her.
Meanwhile, Bridget creates a scheme with Mike. Both are now working in the same insurance office. A little conversation reveals exactly how much information Mike can learn about someone by running a simple credit report. Her plan is to contact women married to men who are provably cheating and offer to kill them for a piece of the insurance settlement.
Of course, since this is film noir, all of this is bluff and cover and double bluff and cover again. Nothing is ever what it seems and those characters with a criminal mind are always one step ahead of not only the other characters, but of the audience as well. This is another reason I love good film noir—it never talks down to the audience. It keeps things hidden until the right moments in the film to reveal them, but never does it in a way that makes the audience feel cheated. Everything here fits from front to back, but the ultimate conclusion isn’t one that is easy to figure out until it happens. In that respect, The Last Seduction is as good as any other noir from the more classic period as well as the best of those from the modern era.
When a film like this lives as far under the radar as this one has, I wonder why it happens. The Last Seduction is genuinely as good as other neo-noirs like L.A. Confidential, but it made a tenth of the money at the box office and garnered far less popular acclaim. Did the production company not know what they had?
I bought a copy of this film some time ago with no knowledge of it other than the fact that it was on the 1001 Movies list and that I’d have to watch it eventually. Now, having seen it, I cannot complain that it is a part of my film collection. I’m damn happy to have a copy that I can watch whenever I need that good noir feeling.
It’s worth saying that while The Last Seduction really fires on all cylinders (even the soundtrack is straight out of ‘50s noir), it works primarily because Linda Fiorentino nails this role and nails it completely. If she didn’t work, the film wouldn’t work, and she works as well any ever has in the role of a truly noteworthy femme fatale.
Why to watch The Last Seduction: Noir made particularly brutal and sexy.
Why not to watch: The ending is not that of the traditional noir.
I like The Last Seduction, but I do think you may be over selling it a bit. Linda Fiorentino is great, but the movie seems to meander a lot and doesn't feel as sharp as something like Red Rock West. I wouldn't put it in the same ballpark as L.A. Confidential, but that may just be personal preference. I am really surprised by the fact that Fiorentino has basically dropped off the mat. She always brings something to the table, even in so-so films.ReplyDelete
I may be overselling it. On the other hand, I may have just liked it a lot more than you did. The film it reminded me most of was Body Heat, which I see I didn't reference above.Delete
Again, I may be overselling it, but I really like Linda Fiorentino.
I don't think you oversold it. This is a great movie, if you like noir.ReplyDelete
The reason it isn't well known is that it was originally a TV movie. When people reacted very positively to it, the producers released it theatrically and tried to get it nominated for Oscars, especially Fiorentino's performance, but anything that does not first appear in a movie theater is disqualified. The controversy over this is how I first heard of the film back in 1995.
The reason Fiorentino dropped of the map, if you believe Hollywood rumors, is that she was miserable to work with. She alienated so many people that she became a pariah. That's why she was not brought back after the first Men in Black film in the late 90s.
I've never heard that about Linda Fiorentino. If true, that may well go to show more of the inherent sexism in the film industry. There are plenty of men who are alleged to be terrible to work with, but they seem to get work.Delete
Here's another one that I wanted to see when it first came out but I never got around to it. I certainly remember the entertainment press talking about the efforts to make The Last Seduction eligible for the Oscars.ReplyDelete
It's a nasty little film noir about some nasty people, so it's the kind of thing I like, especially when it gets the good buzz this film got. And I've loved Linda Fiorentino since I saw The Moderns when it first came out (and I've seen it a few times since then).
How did I let 25 years pass before getting around to The Last Seduction?
It's great. It lives up to its reputation (although there are a few scenes where it's best not to think about it too hard).
It's too bad it didn't qualify for the Academy Awards. Linda Fiorentino would have that Oscar!
This is so good that I consider it "film noir" even though it's in color. I use the term neo-noir for color films, even if they are really good, like Red Rock West. The only other color film that I consider "film noir" instead of neo-noir is Chinatown, so The Last Seduction is in good company.
In my world, the difference between film noir and neo noir are the ages of films and the use of color. Otherwise, they're pretty much the same thing.Delete