Film: The Defiant Ones
Format: DVD from Seneca Public Library through interlibrary loan on kick-ass portable DVD player.
Months ago when Scott Knopf of the Frankly My Dear Podcast was Nick’s and my guest on The Demented Podcast, we talked in part about the film Shaft. Scott mentioned a list of films that he considered essential for understanding race in film, and specifically the African American experience in film. One of the films he mentioned was The Defiant Ones, one of Stanley Kramer’s films investigating racial politics before and around the Civil Rights era.
He’s right. With this film, we start to see a progression in the roles that black actors were able to take. In many ways, Sidney Poitier is the black man that middle America could handle at the time. He was part of a prison chain gang, but arrested and convicted unjustly, for a crime that no white man would have been accused of, let alone sentenced for. He reinforces the stereotype while at the same time being the safest version of an African American that many whites would accept.
Regardless, this is a gripping film. Heading back to prison in a chain gang truck, prisoners John “Joker” Jackson (Tony Curtis) and Noah Cullen (Poitier) are chained together, mostly at the behest of the warden, who knows the two hate each other. There is an accident, and the two are sprung free and head off into the backwoods in an attempt to escape. The two encounter a variety of problems, some because they are chained at the wrist and some because of their own racial division, and eventually bond over their difficulties.
It’s an old formula, in many ways started here first. Two guys who hate each other are bound together in some way, either literally or figuratively, and discover that a mutual respect and even friendship has developed. The events of the film, here involving a difficult climb out of a clay pit, a near lynching at the hands of an angry mob, and an eventual betrayal at the hands of someone they meet on the way, serve as a method to create the metaphorical bond between the men by the end of the running time. It’s every buddy cop film ever made, but this time with the buddies as escaped cons.
Films like The Fugitive borrow a lot from this one, too. We see this most in the time we spend with the authorities looking to catch our two escaped cons. In their own way, these two, Theodore Bikel as Sheriff Max Muller and Charles McGraw as Captain Frank Gibbons are experiencing their own buddy film, although the two of them never end up seeing eye to eye on anything. Throw in jazz music loving dog handler Solly (King Donovan), and you have two groups constantly at odds not only with each other, but internally as well. This is what makes the film work.
In addition to the folks already listed, we get a short but meaningful performance from Claude Akins as a man bent on lynching our two fugitives and Lon Chaney Jr. as a man bent on saving them from that lynching. Cara Williams shows up as a lonely woman looking for a little bit more than some companionship when the two fugitives show up on her doorstep, and she plays the role with a real sense of desperation that is perhaps a little unbelievable, but makes up for this in its essential creepiness.
Films like The Defiant Ones are important. These are films that need to be kept alive and talked about and studied. People need to not simply view this film, but really examine it, really look at the relationships that are depicted here and how they are shown. Hollywood, and indeed American society, has advanced in many ways since the late 1950s, but we aren’t all the way to where we need to be. The Defiant Ones, though, is one of the starting points. The Civil Rights Movement still would have happened without this film, but it certainly didn’t hurt for America to see a wrongly accused black man continually treated unfairly by the unthinking and racist folk of the film.
Despite the fact that this was filmed in the late 1950s, there is a distinctive noir feel to the film. I probably wouldn’t classify it specifically as a noir, but it does contain a lot of the same elements. I looked around to see if anyone else has classified the film that way, and evidently, when it comes at least to bloggers, I am alone. But I stand by that judgment. In terms of character, plot, tone, and especially pessimistic worldview, this belongs at least with neo-noirs or pseudo-noirs in some sort of pantheon. There’s a moral ambiguity here that fits in well with films like Double Indemnity.
It’s worth noting that director Stanley Kramer had quite the track record of films like this. In addition to The Defiant Ones he also directed Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner, Judgment at Nuremburg, and Inherit the Wind as well as a film about Julius and Ethel Rosenberg. Kramer should be better known and more respected than he is.
Why to watch The Defiant Ones: The beginning of race relations in film.
Why not to watch: If you have a “no old movies” hangup, you’ll never watch it anyway.
I have not seen or even heard of The Defiant Ones, will check the trailer. Probably is my cup of tea, as I loved The Fugitive you mention.ReplyDelete
My favourie Sidney Poitier film is A Patch of Blue (1965), which also deals with race issues in a subtle way, and was my number 1 film viewed in 2010!
I'm also curious to see Lilies of the Field (1963), which he won the best actor oscar for.
Seek this one out! It's great and beautifully shot and acted.ReplyDelete
I watched The Defiant Ones last night and I'm kind of mad at myself for never watching it before. I was loving it in the first two or three minutes, which is always a good sign.ReplyDelete
Wasn't it adorable when Tony Curtis woke up and Sydney Poitier was still sleeping, curled up next to him with his head on Curtis's chest? Awww ...
I never noticed that Tony Curtis looks kind of like Eddie Izzard.
Lon Chaney Jr is really good in this! He looks like hell, but it's a great performance.
And then there's "Alfalfa" Switzer in the posse. He was shot and killed just months after this movie was released.
And after watching this, I've seen all the movies nominated for the Oscar for Best Picture in 1958. As you see more of the 1958 films, the worse Gigi looks.
I feel like that about a film at least once a month. So many great movies, so little time. One of the reasons I keep at this is that I make these discoveries (for me) so often that I feel like I'm constantly uncovering these gems that I wouldn't have otherwise known.Delete
I agree completely on Gigi, which currently sits in my second-to-last position for Best Picture winners.
That is an interesting thought about this being a noir. I had not considered it that way, but the elements are there. There is also the Odyssey element like in Oh Brother.ReplyDelete
What I really liked about this movie is the almost philosophical dialogues. It is not difficult to image that they are actually talking about something else and much more fundamental.
The Odyssey element is a good catch.Delete
There's a lot to dig into here despite this being such a simple film on the surface.